So
Which Display Technology is Best?
LCD
vs. Plasma Screen TVs: The Flat Picture
As mentioned, the Plasma TV has the edge in terms of size, black
levels,brightness and, currently, slight refresh rate advantages.
Of those parameters, LCD is quickly catching up in terms of refresh
rate and will eventually support larger sizes (the largest LCD display
is 57” and is manufactured by Samsung). Once this happens, Plasma
will lose its edge and LCD technology will win out. Of course, Plasma
will also make strides in new performance and all this may change
again. As many of the CRT manufacturing plants are slated to convert
over to LCD (Sony decided to quietly phase out its 17” and 19” CRT
displays by March of this year), you can imagine that the technology
as a whole will benefit from smarter, more efficient manufacturing
processes. As this happens, prices will continue to drop and the
smaller LCD market will drive larger flat panel display products
into the homes of consumers.
DLP
vs. LCD vs. LCOS
Rear Projection Televisions
This is where the competition gets interesting.
This is essentially a battle between Texas Instruments, Intel and
all of the LCD manufacturers (Sony, Philips, Toshiba, Samsung).
Many companies are hedging their bets on this one (Samsung manufactures
all 3), however the real winner will be the one who can produce the
best picture at the lowest cost. My bet is on DLP or LCOS. DLP is
currently in its third iteration (HD2+) and will have its fourth
generation product (xHD3) out, or at least announced, by the end
of the year. The advances in DLP both current and forthcoming are
exceptional, but so is Intel’s LCOS chip which is essentially a
densely-packed LCD – creating a finer picture without any of the
“screen door” artifacts found in many LCD displays. Intel has claimed
that LCOS will enable 50-inch HDTV displays for less than $2,000
within a year.
LCD rear projection does
have some advantages, however. It is being developed further and
further and will benefit from rapid price drops as manufacturing
ramps up and technologies improve. Right now you can find large,
HD-ready LCD-based RPTVs for under $1500.
A similar DLP or LCOS version (currently) will cost you at least
$1000 more.
The
Cost Factor: How Much Do I Spend?
How
much do you have? Seriously, though, budget and intended use will
determine the direction you take in what technology you choose.
Those with the strictest budgets will want to break into HDTV via
LCD rear-projection or CRT rear projection. At this price range
($1500 - $2000) CRT rear projection will most likely be the better
performer, but at the cost of weight and power consumption.
If you are desperate for flat panel, it’s
going to be a question of size v. performance. LCDs
cost more than Plasma TVs at equal sizes. The reason for this is
production yields and undersupply. There is currently a condition
of undersupply for many sizes of LCD displays due to the number
of manufacturing plants available and the current configuration
of those plants. Couple this with lower yields on larger display
sizes due to burned out pixels and quality control, and you have
a demand situation which forces LCD prices up for larger displays.
A fair estimate would be that above 30” an LCD TV costs at least
30-40% more than a comparable Plasma display. If you want the benefits
of LCD you will have to pay for it – and we thought Plasma was expensive!
If you are made of money
and want the biggest flat panel around, Samsung and LG have been
battling it out for years, but Samsung has won largest in both Plasma
and LCD this year. They unveiled a 57” LCD TV and an 80” Plasma
screen, both are top in their category and are priced at… well,
more than you want to know.
So, as always, the choice
is up to you. Spend your money wisely, and keep your eyes peeled
for the new technologies as they break into the marketplace. Competition
is always good and should do well to make all the technologies strive
for better performance and lower costs to the consumer.
|
|
D-ILA
|
DLP
|
LCD
|
Plasma
|
LCOS
|
RP LCD
|
RP CRT
|
CRT
|
|
Contrast Ratio****
|
1500:1
|
5000:1*
|
1300:1*
|
3000:1**
|
2000:1
|
800:1****
|
5000:1****
|
4000+:1††
|
|
Max Brightness
|
7000+
lumens
|
750+ cd/m2
|
450 cd/m2
|
1000
cd/m2†††
|
750+ cd/m2
|
450 cd/m2
|
NA
|
1000 cd/m2
|
|
Longevity (hours)
|
1000*†
|
8-10k (lamp)
|
50-75k***
|
60k
|
80k+
|
8-10k (lamp)
|
80k+
|
80k+
|
|
Burn-in
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No†
|
|
Viewing Angle
|
180°
|
170°
|
160°
|
180°
|
180°
|
170°
|
180°
|
180°
|
|
Fully Digital Display
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
Refresh Rate
|
NA
|
NA
|
10-12ms*
|
8ms
|
10-12ms*
|
10-12ms*
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
Max Resolution
|
2048 x 1536
|
1280 x 720
|
1280 x 1024
|
1366 x 768
|
1920 x 1080
|
1280 x 1024
|
720p
1080i+
|
720p
1080i+
|
|
Weight (lbs)
|
15-200
|
15-300
|
20-100
|
42-150+
|
100-120
|
100-120
|
100-200+
|
60-300
|
|
Set Depth
|
NA
|
7" - 20"
|
2"
|
3-6"
|
24" - 30"
|
13" - 20"
|
24" - 30"
|
16" - 30"
|
|
Screen Size
|
NA
|
43" - 65"
|
1" - 57"*
|
30" - 80"
|
42" - 80"
|
42" - 70"
|
42" - 65"
|
20" - 40"
|
|
Power consumption
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
Low
|
High
|
High
|
|
*Fairly
new HD2+ development noticed at CES 2004 (note Sony VPL-HS20 for
LCD) **Real world tests drop this number considerably (400:1)
*** Expected LCD backlight lifespan **** Higher-end known
value given
† Fixed images can result in burn-in over long-term (unusual)
†† Calculated. CRTs not generally shown with contrast ratios.
††† Plasma “real-world” measure about 100 cd/m2 *† Front
projection lamp life is typically <2000 hours
|
Enjoy the movies!
Clint DeBoer
President, CD Media, Inc.